Trump Halts International Student Enrollment at Harvard, Sparking Global Uproar

Ans)     

📘 1. Topic-related Multiple Choice Questions

Q1. Correct Answer: B

Explanation: Trump justified the ban by citing “national security” and “economic fairness,” which he claimed were being compromised by international admissions.

Q2. Correct Answer: C

Explanation: Harvard’s leadership issued a public statement condemning the policy, calling it harmful and a betrayal of American values.

Q3. Correct Answer: A

Explanation: Many international students who were already accepted faced the risk of losing their offers and being left in uncertainty, which the article described as being in "limbo."

Q4. Correct Answer: D

Explanation: International universities, such as those in Europe, responded by offering scholarships and support to students affected by the U.S. policy.

Q5. Correct Answer: C

Explanation: Legal action, including lawsuits alleging constitutional violations, was one of the main responses from critics of the policy.

📕 2. Vocabulary Multiple Choice Questions

Q6. Correct Answer: B — xenophobic

Explanation: "Xenophobic" refers to a fear or hatred of foreigners or strangers.

Q7. Correct Answer: D — inexorable

Explanation: "Inexorable" means something that is impossible to stop or prevent, such as a policy or force.

Q8. Correct Answer: B — affluent

Explanation: "Affluent" describes someone who is wealthy or has a lot of financial resources.

Q9. Correct Answer: D — specious

Explanation: A "specious" argument seems correct or true on the surface but is actually false or misleading.

Q10. Correct Answer: C — thwart

Explanation: "Thwart" means to prevent someone from achieving a goal or completing a plan.

📗 3. Inference Multiple Choice Questions

Q11. Correct Answer: B

Explanation: The article implies that barring international students could hurt the U.S.'s reputation and role in global education, leading to long-term isolation.

Q12. Correct Answer: D

Explanation: The mention of lawsuits shows that many individuals and organizations are formally opposing the policy, indicating widespread resistance.

Q13. Correct Answer: D

Explanation: Being in "limbo" implies the students are in a state of uncertainty, unsure about their enrollment or future plans.

Q14. Correct Answer: B

Explanation: Foreign universities responded by offering help, which suggests they are stepping in to support students excluded from U.S. institutions.

Q15. Correct Answer: C

Explanation: Describing a policy as "arbitrary" means it lacks logical reasoning or consistency and is therefore seen as unfair or random.

📙 4. SAT-style Multiple Choice Questions

Q16. Correct Answer: C

Explanation: The article takes a critical tone and expresses concern about the consequences of the policy on education and global relations.

Q17. Correct Answer: B

Explanation: Quoting respected leaders such as Harvard’s president appeals to ethos (credibility) and moral values.

Q18. Correct Answer: C

Explanation: The primary goal of the article is to inform the reader and warn about the serious consequences of the directive.

Q19. Correct Answer: A

Explanation: "Global Education in Crisis" captures the central theme that international education is under threat due to political intervention.

Q20. Correct Answer: B

Explanation: The group most directly affected by the directive are international students who were planning to attend U.S. institutions.

📒 5. TOEFL-style Multiple Choice Questions

Q21. Correct Answer: C

Explanation: The article specifically mentions lawsuits being filed against the directive, making this statement true.

Q22. Correct Answer: B

Explanation: Nowhere in the article is Harvard said to have been legally dissolved, making this the correct “NOT mentioned” choice.

Q23. Correct Answer: A

Explanation: The term “reverberate” is used metaphorically to describe the widespread and lasting impact of the policy.

Q24. Correct Answer: D

Explanation: "Insular" is used to criticize elite institutions for being closed off or narrow in perspective, not connected to geography.

Q25. Correct Answer: D

Explanation: The article suggests backlash and legal pressure might lead to the reversal or modification of the directive.

📓 6. IELTS-Style True / False / Not Given Questions

Q26. Answer: Not Given

Explanation: The article does not mention Trump claiming Harvard was controlled by foreign governments.

Q27. Answer: True

Explanation: The article states that international students might lose their admissions, placing them in "limbo."

Q28. Answer: True

Explanation: Lawsuits and legal opposition are directly discussed as reactions to the policy.

Q29. Answer: False

Explanation: The article says some universities resisted or delayed implementing the directive.

Q30. Answer: True

Explanation: International institutions were described as stepping in to help students who were affected.

Writing Sample

Essay

In recent years, some governments have attempted to limit the number of international students attending prestigious universities, claiming that such policies protect local opportunities and national interests. While this approach may seem justified on the surface, I firmly disagree with restricting international admissions, as I believe it undermines educational quality, global cooperation, and economic growth.

To begin with, international students play a vital role in enriching academic environments. They bring diverse perspectives, experiences, and problem-solving approaches that enhance classroom discussions and research innovation. For example, universities such as Harvard and Oxford have consistently ranked among the top globally, not just due to local talent but because of their openness to the best minds from around the world. Limiting access based on nationality compromises meritocracy and dilutes academic excellence.

Furthermore, such restrictions damage international relations and the soft power of education. When students are welcomed from different nations, they often return home with positive impressions and long-lasting diplomatic ties. Conversely, rejecting them based on origin may be perceived as xenophobic, fueling resentment and reducing global collaboration in fields such as science, business, and climate policy.

Economically, international students also contribute significantly. They pay full tuition, rent housing, and support local economies. In many countries, their financial contributions help fund scholarships for domestic students and sustain university programs. Restricting their enrollment may lead to reduced revenue and fewer educational resources for all students.

In conclusion, while supporting domestic students is a worthy goal, excluding international applicants from top universities is both short-sighted and harmful. A balanced approach that expands access for all, rather than restricting some, will benefit both local and global communities. (words: 285)

Short answer questions

• 1.What is one benefit international students bring to classrooms?
  

• They bring diverse perspectives and experiences.
  

• 
  
  

• 2.Why do some governments limit international student admissions?
  

• To prioritize local students and protect national interests.
  

• 
  
  

• 3.How do international students support the economy?
  

• They pay tuition, rent housing, and spend money locally.
  

• 
  
  

•